|
Sunday, November 07, 2004
Movie Critique: What the Bleep Do We Know?
I had no idea what I was going to see, but a friend said that they had heard that this was a thought provoking film. That is was. For those who don't know it, I love thinking about the big picture, and the unanswerable questions about Why we are here, What's our purpose, and Is there anything to eat in the fridge? This film enchanted me for its two hours.
Believe it or not, this film's genre was a documentary/comedy/drama on the subject of Quantum Physics! You heard me. If that wasn't a hard enough subject, they also entwined the Physics with religious overtones that I'm sure will come to some startling conclusions for some. Now, I'm actually going to discuss what I learned from the movie in the coming paragraphs. But before I do, know that I would love to get a group together to watch it again and discuss it afterwards. My synopsis will be very elementary and I don't feel that it really ruins the movie but, if you're going to see it and don't want it spoiled in any way, STOP READING NOW! If you are still reading this, please feel free to comment, but under one condition. All ideas are to be treated with respect. Personally, I'm not sure anybody has the perfect solution to the why's, who's, and how's of the world. I ask that you comment with an open mind and acceptance of all views, even if they are personally distasteful to you.
The movie uncovers the transience of atoms (sometimes they are there, and sometimes they dissapear), the concept of superpositioning (the same object being in multiple places as once) and the effect that thought can have on a droplet of water. Good thoughts of "thank you" or "I Love You" formed beautiful, near symmetrical shapes when looked at through a dark field microscope. As you might imagine, "I hate you" resulted in a distorted image. From there, they lay claim to our unconscious psychic ability to actually make ourselves better, or harm ourselves based on our personal self image (remember the body is 80% water).
The film also deals with reality and our perception of it. Because of reality's subjective nature, we can not be outside observers, therefore, there is no way of knowing if we all live in one reality or in infinite realities that bump into each other. Really mind blowing stuff, when you come to think of it. There's also a cool story about our past experiences actually determining what we can see or not see! I thought this was bogus, but to be honest it has happened to me countless times. Have you ever looked in a drawer for something, say a bottle opener. But because, you didn't think that it would be there, you don't see it. Then, a minute later, you open the drawer to find it. They explain this by your mind opening up to it being there, rather than by experiential data that tells you it can't possibly be there. That happened to me just this week!
There are also interesting sections on the how all matter is connected and really empty, rather than statically full of mass, like we would think when we touch a chair. You'll laugh at the irreverant examples they give to show the effect of peptides (released by the hypothalamus) on your body at the molecular level. They also detail how the synapse bridges in your brain are created and become ingrained or whither and die. No wonder we get crusty in how we think! We've pre-circuited ourselves to think and see things in certain ways over years and year of practice.
Ultimately, the film makes a point that you have to take PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for your life and how it turns out. You, not society and the pressures you find yourself reacting to, have the ability to create and enhance your future reality. In a sense, you are your own god. While the god thing may not be to your liking, I love the personal responsibility message.
This idea is not necessarily a new one. Richard Bach wrote about this some twenty year's ago in several books. An ancient Chinese philosophy, Taoism, preaching about living in harmony with nature (and the universe) strives for humans to be connected and on the path (the Tao) to universal enlightenment.
Now does this film answer the age old questions? Maybe not all, but at least it gets you thinking.
I thoroughly enjoyed this film. Although you will probably catch yourself feeling like you're in a school lecture hall at some point, it had me on the edge of my seat. Most of the professors are people you'd really want to meet. I'm amazed that they could explain really deep stuff in an understandle and interesting way. If you have an open mind, don't mind challenging your belief system, and want get your grey matter thinking, I heartily endorse this film.
I wouldn't mind seeing it again, if we'd like to get a group together and perhaps want to discuss it ourselves. Heck, I'll even open my domicile to host the group!
Posted at 06:08 pm by john_manser
 |  |  | scotland July 31, 2005 08:19 PM PDT
Hi John,
Very nice collections of ideas. I too am a big Richard Bach fan. On the other hand, I was not a fan of 'What The Bleep'. I didn't like the mixture of hard science and pseudo science in the movie. I mean, I don't mind mixing the two, but in the movie they didn't tell you where the line was. As an example, Dr.
Masaru Emoto water experiments were hocus pocus and unrepeatable smoke and mirrors. However, they passed it off in the movie as real science. Not cool. Other points were right on, but over all I felt the movie to be minipulative. The key point "personal responsibility", yeah I liked that too. Just my thoughts. Anyway, thanks for writing. |  |
  |  |  | Mary Ann November 16, 2004 07:28 PM PST
I'm always up for a great movie! Count me in. No comments on your write-up since I took your advice and stopped reading so I will have my own opinions without suffering from any "Manser taint". |  |
  |  |  | Catherine November 9, 2004 10:04 AM PST
John, I'm totally amazed at your retention of so much of the film, and your synopsis of it. I saw it too, but have been at a loss as to how to communicate what it was actually about. I'd certainly see it again, just to retain more of the ideas. |  |
  |  |  | Kitty November 8, 2004 10:19 AM PST
Sign me up (and Phil, in Kitty-speak, that means I will show, unlike you know who!). This movie has been on my "must see" list. Agree with Beth - with this group - we will have some really interesting discussions! |  |
  |  |  | Beth November 8, 2004 09:27 AM PST
Sounds like an interesting film. Something to get the brain engaged. I bet that with our group, we could get some really interesting discussion going too. Count me in. |  |
  |  |  | Other Becky's Jeff November 7, 2004 11:44 PM PST
Great write-up John -- thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts on this film. I'm very interested in seeing it and in a group chat at Chez Manser. |  |
  |  |  | Becky November 7, 2004 11:09 PM PST
Well if it was *meant to be* then we will see it (ha ha). Sounds perfect, that is, if you're into that "thinking stuff".... probably good to balance all the physical activities with some mental gymnastics every now and then -- Count us in!! |  |
  |  |  | Stevie B November 7, 2004 08:39 PM PST
This movie sounds like a "must see".....very thought provoking and "deep." Can't wait to see if it changes my view of the world & increases my IQ!!! I'm going this week for sure. Thanks for the blog. |  |
|
|